Louis-Alexandre , 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you will Saliba, 2016; dos Santos and you may Jalalzai, 2021). In this performs we’ll manage misogyny since acknowledged by our very own interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s 6 many years in fuel, particularly emphasizing the partnership anywhere between misogynistic backlash and gendered twice join character understood. On after the area we provide a very nuanced definition to own each one of the subcategories identified (find Table 2), taking remain-alone significance and you may advice regarding the data in conjunction with detailed analyses away from secret moments within the Rousseff’s presidency you to exemplify the fresh dynamic between our very own nuanced suggestion to have examining the fresh new gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, and its issues on Rousseff’s presidency.
The newest four subcategories identified appeared in the details in the differing accounts (look for Dining tables 3, 4). A couple of themes appeared in high proportion: Analysis so you’re able to Guys and Misogynyments styled while the evaluation so you can men searched for the nearly half of all interviews and you can portrayed thirty-six percent out-of all of the statements codifiedments inspired as the misogyny have been almost all statements (38 %) and appeared in forty two per cent of all of the interview. Simply put, interviewees had been extremely aware away from Rousseff’s part since the chairman in contrast to other men political figures and you can former presidents, and suggests Rousseff is actually penalized through the their particular management because of gendered assumption and you can backlash.
While you are appearing having shorter frequency in the interviews, one other one or two themes render crucial framework in order to information you’ll sexist backlash in presidency off Brazil’s very first lady president. Talks on how Rousseff tried https://internationalwomen.net/sv/blog/traffa-lokala-kvinnor/ to adhere to gendered expectations ascribed so you’re able to feminine (Complying for the Twice Bind) starred in more than ten percent of your own remark coded and you can interviews presented. At the same time, conversation about Rousseff challenged the new gendered hopes of their particular reputation (Difficult the Double Join) starred in more than one fifth of all the interview, constituting 16 % of all the comments coded.
The new dysfunction of the numerical density of your thematic investigation brings a starting point to help you a great qualitative analysis of any theme, focusing on the relationship anywhere between for each and every motif, especially the commitment amongst the around three templates truly linked to the gendered double join (investigations, complying, and you can difficult) and also the misogynistic backlash that implemented.
Analysis to guys
Among the subcategories recognized is evaluations out of Dilma Rousseff in order to dudes, both evaluating Rousseff to help you men political leaders and outlining exactly how things was more when the Rousseff was indeed men. Hence, we unearthed that there was both an abstract part and you will fundamental element of their review to help you men. Within the a conceptual feel, we quite often noticed the expression, “when the she have been a guy” to spell it out how the right position could have starred away in different ways had Dilma perhaps not become a woman. The new story depicted within interviews try out-of a system you to “likes dudes” (Respondent 88, ), which have “zero unlock gender discrimination, nevertheless fact that [a great politician] is actually a man was a plus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever sharing it assessment significantly more concretely, discover a look closely at Rousseff’s scratchy personality, the newest “difficult woman up to sensitive men.” New offer lower than provides much more perspective:
Conversations regarding Rousseff’s impeachment additionally the sexism and misogyny trailing the latest process had been discussed in the preferred news (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and Kaiser, 2016) plus scholarly functions (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Yes, and so they mentioned that she try a hard person, one to she could not communicate with anyone, one she had an enthusiastic authoritarian way of speaking. Everything that for males appears as a compliment “zero, he could be a challenging individual, a self-confident person that knows what the guy wants.” To their unique was showed because negative “zero, she doesn’t understand how to speak, the woman is hard, this woman is this” into the a terrible method. The way they keep in touch with united states, feminine. We have achieved a specific condition, we have been are severe, we’re deviating away from so you’re able to how to become a lady, who is sweet, clear, quiet and you may such as. The form of Dilma being ‘s the version of women that manage to be strong within a totally patriarchal community, up against so it acquisition you to definitely can be acquired (Respondent 79, ).