Nicolas After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are reviving these systems. By lie detection tools analyzed at the border to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technology is being utilized for asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to find their way these systems and to pursue their right for safeguards.
It also shows how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from accessing the programs of coverage. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who also are regimented by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: whilst they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.