Nicolas After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these systems. From lie detection tools tested at the line to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being utilised in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to understand these devices and to go after their right for safeguard.
It also illustrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from getting at the stations of proper protection. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary find more mechanisms of those technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects just who are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double result: when they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult just for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.