Background That belong: Exactly how Stereotypical Cues Effect Gender Participation when you look at the Computer Science

3 novembre 2023
Louis-Alexandre

Background That belong: Exactly how Stereotypical Cues Effect Gender Participation when you look at the Computer Science

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and you may Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Jobs 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. An excellent., Montoya, Good. K., and you will Jiang, L. (2017). What makes Certain Base sphere More Gender Balanced Than the others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–thirty five. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you can Hudson, L. (2013). The fresh Stereotypical Computer system Researcher: Gendered media Representations given that a boundary so you can Addition for ladies. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Jobs 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Age., and you may Lo, L. (2013). Carry out gender-science Stereotypes Assume Science Identification and Technology Job Ambitions Among Undergraduate Science Discipline? Soc. Psychol. Educ. sixteen (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende into the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und auch Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Pupils inside the mathematics, pc technology, science and you can techology (STEM) industries . Retrieved out-of

Diekman, A great. B., Steinberg, Yards., Brownish, E. Roentgen., Belanger, An effective. L., and Clark, Age. K. (2017). A goal Congruity Model of Part Entry, Wedding, and you will Leave: Understanding Public Purpose Processes in Stalk Gender Holes. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, An effective. H., and you may Karau, S. J. (2002). Part Congruity Theory out-of Prejudice to the Feminine Leaders. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.3.573

Eagly, A beneficial. H., and you may Wood, W. (2012). “Personal Character Concept,” for the Guide from Concepts away from Personal Mindset, Frequency II. Writers P. van Lange, An excellent. Kruglanski, and you may E. Higgins (La, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, An excellent. A good., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, Roentgen. K., and you will West, K. (2020). Exactly how Gender and Race Stereotypes Change the Continuing growth of Scholars into the STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations regarding Physics and Biology Article-Doctoral Applicants. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Trip, N. Yards., Hyde, J. S., and you will Linn, Meters. C. (2010). Cross-national Designs off Gender Variations in Math: A beneficial Meta-Studies. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equivalence Agency Closet Place of work (2017). Gender Equality Light Papers (Contribution Edition. Tokyo, Japan: Light papers into gender equality 2017 . Recovered out of

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A beneficial., and you can Brooks, An effective. W. (2015)pared so you’re able to Men, Women Take a look at Top-notch Development due to the fact Just as Achievable, however, Smaller Trendy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A beneficial. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Gray, J. A. utenrikssaker Venezuelan bruder, and you can McN). The brand new Neuropsychology of Nervousness: An enquiry to the Functions of your pal System. Oxford: Oxford College Push .

Greenwald, An excellent. Grams., McGhee, D. Age., and you will Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Calculating Personal Differences in Implicit Cognition: Brand new Implicit Association Try. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.6.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and you can Lee, C. M. (2003). Examining this new Legitimacy of Thinking Construal Scales. Humm Res 31 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, M. Elizabeth., and you can Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: Deficiencies in Match Framework. Group Procedure. Intergroup Connections 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, An excellent., Kano, K., Minamizaki, Good., McKay, E., and you will Yokoyama, H. M. (2019). Adult Egalitarian Perceptions toward Gender Positions Apply to Contract into Girls Delivering Base fields on university into the The japanese. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, A., Kano, K., Inoue, A beneficial., McKay, Elizabeth., and you may Yokoyama, H. Meters. (2020). Gender-biased Societal Perception out-of Base fields, Centering on the fresh new Dictate regarding Egalitarian Attitudes on Gender Jobs. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/dos.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, Grams., Dukala, K., and you can Szastok, Meters. (2020). The newest Stalk Graduate: Immediately after Graduation, Group Currently Disagree in Occupations Effects, Attributions for success, and Wished Occupations Qualities. J. Soc. Activities 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, Yards. (2016). Cultural Differences in Survey Reacting: Products and you may Understanding on Study of Impulse Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386